NeLM news service
Inhaled corticosteroids vs. placebo for preventing COPD exacerbations: systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference: Chest 2010; 137: 318-325

Source: CHEST

Date published: 05/02/2010 16:32

Summary
by: Yuet Wan

The benefits of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in preventing COPD exacerbations seem to be overstated, according to the findings of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

 

Researchers searched the published literature (1988-2008) for RCTs that evaluated the efficacy of ICS vs placebo in preventing COPD exacerbations, and carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis. They also performed a meta-regression of trials to evaluate the risk reduction with every percentage decline in baseline values of FEV1 across studies. They identified 11 studies (8164 patients) and reported the following findings:

 

• The use of ICS was associated with reduction in the occurrence of exacerbations (relative risk, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.92).

 

• There was the presence of significant statistical heterogeneity but no evidence of publication bias.

 

• Sensitivity analysis revealed benefit of ICS only in patients with FEV1 < 50% (0.79; 0.69 to 0.89).

 

• A meta-regression analysis failed to demonstrate a linear relationship between FEV1 values and decline in COPD exacerbations with the use of ICS.

 

The researchers concluded that there is only a modest benefit of ICS in preventing COPD exacerbations, which is not related to the level of baseline lung function. They call for a reappraisal of the role of ICS in the prevention of COPD exacerbations.

About this library entry
NeLM area:  News

Preview your comment

Add new comment

Comment text:

Comments

There are no comments yet. You could be the first! You must be Logged In to comment.